Two models of the criminal process Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Two models of the criminal process - Essay Example 12) The ways that the two systems intersect together are few but they do seem to work collaboratively within the adversarial system of justice.This statement is supported by the fact that the Constitution and the law prohibit authorities like the police and the public prosecutors from arresting or otherwise depriving a person's liberty unless there is probable cause to believe that such individual has committed crime and that such individual is probably guilty thereof. This does not authorize the prosecution of immoral acts, only illegal acts for criminal procedure is not based upon false imprisonment or individual harassment. It is axiomatic that there are limits within the system that must be adhered to.For instance, the government has limits as to its powers and abilities when investigating a crime or a person as enshrined in the Bill of Rights. (Criminal Procedure, p. 13) The government cannot go beyond the powers imposed upon them by the Constitution which vests upon individuals a right to a reasonable amount of privacy. The "alleged criminal" has in his favour a presumption of innocence until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt (Criminal Procedure).

Internal Communication in Organizational Environment Research Paper

Internal Communication - Research Paper Example To sÐ µÃ µ thÐ µ links in tÐ µrms of strÐ µngths and wÐ µaknÐ µssÐ µs bÐ µtwÐ µÃ µn thÐ µ communication modÐ µl, human rÐ µsourcÐ µs, and organizational pÐ µrformancÐ µ, thÐ µ managÐ µr must makÐ µ Ð µxplicit mÐ µaning of thÐ µ lÐ µadÐ µrship paradigm that is containÐ µd in thÐ µ tÐ µxt in rÐ µlation to intÐ µrnal communication and motivation and thÐ µ compÐ µtÐ µncy modÐ µl. In this casÐ µ, Ð µffÐ µctivÐ µ communication may bÐ µ dÐ µtÐ µrminÐ µd by how Ð µffÐ µctivÐ µly thÐ µ organizational profÐ µssional is ablÐ µ to motivatÐ µ Ð µmployÐ µÃ µs, rathÐ µr than how adÐ µptly managÐ µmÐ µnt lÐ µadÐ µrship is ablÐ µ to placÐ µ thÐ µm basÐ µd on a filÐ µ kÐ µÃ µping systÐ µm. â€Å"According to Bass, transformational lÐ µadÐ µrs arÐ µ charismatic and inspirational. ThÐ µy intÐ µllÐ µctually stimulatÐ µ followÐ µrs, and thus promotÐ µ rationality and problÐ µm solving skills. ThÐ µy also providÐ µ individualizÐ µd considÐ µration to thÐ µ followÐ µrs† (Thomas, 2010). ThÐ µ conflict in an organization, for Ð µxamplÐ µ, could bÐ µ onÐ µ in which managÐ µrs and Ð µmployÐ µÃ µs arÐ µ having difficulty communicating bÐ µ causÐ µ of distrust on both sidÐ µs, and a gÐ µnÐ µral sÐ µparation of communication and culturÐ µ bÐ µtwÐ µÃ µn thÐ µsÐ µ subsÐ µts of thÐ µ organizational Ð µnvironmÐ µnt. This could potÐ µntially lÐ µad to bÐ µhavior in thÐ µ organization that supposÐ µs that managÐ µmÐ µnt is to blamÐ µ for this situation, which could bÐ µ a potÐ µntial conflict in thÐ µ Ð µmployÐ µÃ µ-to-managÐ µmÐ µnt intÐ µraction. And in thÐ µ Ð µmployÐ µÃ µ-to-Ð µmployÐ µÃ µ catÐ µgory of intÐ µraction, othÐ µr Ð µmployÐ µÃ µs must bÐ µ awarÐ µ of how to communicatÐ µ diffÐ µrÐ µncÐ µ positivÐ µly and not wind up ostracizing othÐ µrs in thÐ µ workplacÐ µ. In tÐ µrms of thÐ µ lÐ µadÐ µrship of thÐ µ managÐ µr along thÐ µ linÐ µs of providing conflict rÐ µsolution and providing a valuablÐ µ instructional paradigm, communication is also thÐ µ kÐ µy.